Capital and Supply Chain Constraints Impact Nuclear Reactor Builds
The financial and industrial readiness for nuclear reactor construction are closely linked, particularly following the experiences with Vogtle 3 and 4. These projects highlighted the significant risks involved in large-scale nuclear builds.
On March 29, 2017, Westinghouse filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to extensive schedule delays and cost overruns associated with its AP1000 reactor projects at Vogtle and V.C. Summer. This event demonstrated the potential for such projects to lead to the collapse of the companies involved in their construction.
The bankruptcy of Westinghouse served as a critical lesson for firms globally that are involved in building reactors. The market absorbed this event as a consequence of underpriced risk in project planning and execution. This has subsequently influenced how engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) firms approach new nuclear projects.
Currently, requests for proposals (RFPs) submitted to EPCs for new reactor developments are frequently met with no-bids, rather than shared-risk term sheets. This trend indicates a heightened level of caution among these firms. Companies that witnessed a competitor's bankruptcy on a first-of-a-kind nuclear build are now more selective, prioritizing projects that appear more feasible and less risky.